Day Two of the ‘Woven Communities’ basketry symposium was
just as good as Day One. Everyone arrived early to have a go at making bits and
bobs and playing with materials, and there was lots of swapping of ideas,
techniques and experiences before the presentations got underway.
I’d say that there was a more temporal theme to the day,
looking at basketry in the past, present and future. The first session, ‘Basketry
and the past’, focused on basketry (or the absence of it) in the archaeological
record. Willeke Wendrich of UCLA showed us some photos of ancient basketry from
Egypt and other parts of the Mediterranean. She made an interesting point about
how ‘tradition’ means different things to different people, giving an example
of two basketmaking communities in Nubia – one which goes to great lengths to
find traditional materials, valuing the material above all, while the other uses
modern materials such as chocolate wrappers, valuing the pattern and colour
above all. Next up was Hugh Cheape from the University of the Highlands and
Islands on the subject of curachs (coracles) and coffins. This was followed by
a joint presentation by two conservators, Sherry Doyal and Pieta Greaves, who
spoke about the practicalities and problems of conserving the very few waterlogged
baskets that are found.
While the official title of the next session was ‘National
and international woven communities’, it was very much a session about the
present. First up was Joe Hogan, a basketmaker and artist from Ireland, who
gave a wonderful talk about Irish baskets and his own practice. We often talk
about regional variation in baskets, but Joe gave examples of variations
between villages often only three or four miles apart. He was followed by Anne
Morrell of the Calico Museum of Textiles in Ahmenabad, India, who looked at the
relationship between embroidery and basketmaking, and cautioned us against our
obsession with naming every stitch, weave, action etc. There was a great quote from
Anne ‘Do not assume that things are made using the same methods you know about’.
The final talk of this session was from Carlos Fontales, an expert in Spanish
basketry, who spoke about the relationship between basketry and pottery in
making jugs to hold wine, and introduced us to beautiful woven willow jugs
lined with pine resin to make them watertight.
The afternoon session began with a mixture of present and
future, looking at ideas of sustainability. Mary Butcher spoke about
sustainable resources in basketmaking and some of the problems facing supplies
of willow (shortage of beds and commercially grown willow), cane (an export ban
imposed by the Indonesian government, the largest supplier of cane) and black
ash (being destroyed in the millions by the emerald ash borer beetle). Rehema
White of the University of St Andrews discussed ideas of sustainable development
in relation to basketmaking. Ben Campbell of the University of Durham looked at
the effects of nature conservation in Nepal on a bamboo basketmaking culture – when
the creation of the Langtang National Park in 1976 banned the trade in forest
products and made it necessary to have a licence to cut bamboo.
The final session of the symposium was ‘Weaving into the
future’. I gave a talk about intangible heritage and heritage craft, and spoke
about the work the HCA is doing to ensure that craft skills and knowledge carry
on into the future. This was followed by a discussion session led by Emma
Walker of CraftScotland, with basketmakers Lois Walpole and Jane Wilkinson, and
me, and contributions from the floor. The day ended with Tim Ingold of the University
of Aberdeen bringing together the various strands of the symposium, such as
tradition, knowledge, materials, politics and a whole lot more.
To cap off the day Ewan Balfour, a landscape architect and
basketmaker from Shetland, finished the kishie he had been making throughout
the conference. On the first day, he could be seen in the front row making what
seemed like an endless length of rope, and on the second day he made the
basket. That was one of the great things about the conference – the mix of the practical
and the academic – and it was great to see people working away with their
hands, exploring materials and having an experiment while listening to the
talks.